Archive for January 29th, 2009

What subjects should I take in college if I wish to pursue cardiology in the future?

Thursday, January 29th, 2009
χ.ℓιкє α ℓιgнтє∂ ѕιℓнσυєттє.χ asked:


I’m about to start my final year in secondary school this September, and the prospect of college has come up. I want to become a cardiologist in the future, but I have no idea about what subjects I need to take in college. Thanks for any help.

Scott
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

Cardiology India - Heart Healthy Diet

Thursday, January 29th, 2009
Ravi asked:


Recently, separate reports were released from the Harvard School of Public Health (in the Journal of the American Medical Association) and by the Institute of Medicine on the health effects of eating fish.

 

The Harvard report, which was based on a review of medical literature, was all but glowing in its endorsement of fish. The authors concluded that a modest intake of fish and shellfish, defined as one or two servings per week, was associated with a significant drop in mortality from heart disease, and in overall mortality. They brushed off the potential health risks from mercury and other contaminants in seafood as being low, and in any case, being overwhelmed by the health benefits.

 

The IOM report was far less glowing in its endorsement of seafood. The IOM found, in an extensive 400-page report (an executive summary of which can be found here), that eating fish “may reduce people’s overall risk for developing heart disease,” but that firm data proving that fish can strongly impact health are lacking. Likewise, they cited a lack of objective evidence regarding the risks of eating seafood, and in particular, a lack of reliable information on the distribution of contaminants in seafood.

 

They concluded that it is probably healthful for most individuals to eat two 3-ounce servings of seafood per week, including up to 6 ounces of albacore tuna, but that large predatory fish such as shark, swordfish, tilefish or king mackerel should be avoided. These conclusions are consistent with prior recommendations released by the Food and Drug Administration.

 

An article in The New York Times picked up on the variance between these two high-profile reports, and described the reaction of several environmental and consumer groups to these reports. That reaction can be summarized as follows: both reports are objectionable because they underplay the risks associated with consuming seafood, in particular the risk of mercury. The Harvard report is additionally objectionable because it vastly overplays the benefits of eating seafood.



Jorge
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google